In PC replacements: Lawyers, auditors and common sense, Peter Kastner argues that companies may have a fiduciary responsibility to update computer equipment. Anyone working with an outdated and underpowered computer might want to place a copy of this article on the boss’s desk.
Jakob Nielsen and others have been highly critical of PDFs lately. Not surprisingly, there is another side of the story. This article on PlanetPDF.com critiques those critiques and presents the other side of the story.
When I returned home from a very productive and enjoyable TechShow 2004 board meeting in Denver, I saw an article called “Tech for Less” in the ABA’s eJournal Report. The article quotes me at length on some of my favorite topics: wise use of technology budgets, IT portfolio management and the like.
I had a pretty lengthy conversation with the author and while she emphasized a few points a bit differently than I would have, I think the article contains a lot of good points for lawyers to consider.
My final point in the article, however, lost a little in translation, because my point of view is a little counter-intuitive. The article says: “If you have a terrific Web site, Kennedy says, then consider investing in another area where you are lagging behind other attorneys.” My belief, in fact, is that in a slow economy you should seriously consider prioritizing investments in areas in which you are already ahead to further distance yourself from your competition. So, if you have a great web site, you should think hard about putting more money into the site to extend the gap between you and your competitors.
That said, it’s definitely an article that’s worth a read and there are also some excellent comments from Andy Adkins.
A week or so ago my friend and personal biotech guru, Kevin Buckley, invited me to a bill signing for Missouri House Bill 688, which Kevin played a key role in drafting. The new law is pretty cool – dedicating a portion of Missouri’s tobacco settlement funds to life sciences research and development.
His invitation prompted me to pull out the copy of Matt Ridley’s Genome that I had been wanting to read for a while. As I read a chapter on Gregor Mendel the night before the signing, I found myself wondering whatever happened to all the notes and research that Luther Burbank did with plants. I made a mental note to check into that.
The next day at the signing, Kevin and I were talking with Dennis Roedemeier of the Missouri Department of Economic Development and, much to my surprise, he started talking about Luther Burbank.
As it turns out, Burbank was so impressed by the work at the Stark Brothers nurseries in Louisiana, Missouri (still a major seed and plant supplier) that he assigned them his patents and materials. Part of this fascinating story is told in this paper written by Dan Kevles for a Yale Law School legal theory workshop.
Missouri has been billing itself as the “Biobelt” recently, which seemed a bit of an overreach to me (because I didn’t know the history), but, as I now consider the lineage of Burbank and Stark Bros., the work of Peter Raven at the Missouri Botanical Garden, and the world-renowned work on Washington University, Monsanto and other Missouri entities in the plant sciences, that moniker now seems quite fitting.
There is no one who is more enthusiastic about the future of biotech in Missouri than my friend Kevin Buckley and his enthusiasm grew by leaps and bounds as we heard this story. I thought that I might even be driving with him out to Stark Bros. that same afternoon, but we’re saving that for another day. Given the Burbank pedigree, the great history of Missouri biotech seems highly likely to evolve into quite a future.
By the way, this was my first bill signing. Governor Holden won a vote by personalizing an autograph to my daughter and giving her a signed copy of the bill and the pen he used. Thanks to the governor for letting me score some major Dad points.