<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: By Request Week: Are there any software tools specifically designed for commercial lawyers?</title> <atom:link href="http://denniskennedy.com/blog/2006/08/by-request-week-are-there-any-software-tools-specifically-designed-for-commercial-lawyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://denniskennedy.com/blog/2006/08/by-request-week-are-there-any-software-tools-specifically-designed-for-commercial-lawyers/</link> <description>Legal technology, technology law and other musings.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Simon Lewis</title><link>http://denniskennedy.com/blog/2006/08/by-request-week-are-there-any-software-tools-specifically-designed-for-commercial-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link> <dc:creator>Simon Lewis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:55:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://denniskennedy_com.innosoftware.net/?p=1121#comment-147</guid> <description><![CDATA[Great blog, particularly emphasising case management and document assembly.  However, I would de-emphasize standalone document management programs, and disagree with Dan&#039;s comment re picking such programs first.  That is a &quot;tail wag the dog&quot; approach like accounting in the 1980&#039;s and CRM more recently.  You first need a lawyer-empowering practice/case management system, not &quot;afterthought&quot; functionality.  A lawyer&#039;s focus is client work and involves phone calls, meetings, emails, research, time recording etc AND documents.  It should be matter-centric, not just document-centric.  Document management, like accounting, is just one component and needs to be put into perspective.
This was highlighted in an extract from the visionery 1989 book &quot;Computerizing for Personal Productivity: A Guide for the High Performance Lawyer&quot; by S Michael Brookes: http://tinyurl.com/fa3d2.  Better legal practice management systems do document management, while giving you an option to integrate a full-blown document management system.  However, as the document management capabilities of practice management systems improve, the need for a separate system diminishes, particurly in smaller firms.
BTW  Here is an ad featuring Michael well before his book:  http://tinyurl.com/obxrd.  Interestingly, it also features Dale Wainwright who is now the Product Manager at Gavel &amp; Gown, one company that does get the lawyer-first approach.
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog, particularly emphasising case management and document assembly.  However, I would de-emphasize standalone document management programs, and disagree with Dan&#8217;s comment re picking such programs first.  That is a &#8220;tail wag the dog&#8221; approach like accounting in the 1980&#8242;s and CRM more recently.  You first need a lawyer-empowering practice/case management system, not &#8220;afterthought&#8221; functionality.  A lawyer&#8217;s focus is client work and involves phone calls, meetings, emails, research, time recording etc AND documents.  It should be matter-centric, not just document-centric.  Document management, like accounting, is just one component and needs to be put into perspective.<br
/> This was highlighted in an extract from the visionery 1989 book &#8220;Computerizing for Personal Productivity: A Guide for the High Performance Lawyer&#8221; by S Michael Brookes: <a
href="http://tinyurl.com/fa3d2" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/fa3d2</a>.  Better legal practice management systems do document management, while giving you an option to integrate a full-blown document management system.  However, as the document management capabilities of practice management systems improve, the need for a separate system diminishes, particurly in smaller firms.<br
/> BTW  Here is an ad featuring Michael well before his book: <a
href="http://tinyurl.com/obxrd" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/obxrd</a>.  Interestingly, it also features Dale Wainwright who is now the Product Manager at Gavel &#038; Gown, one company that does get the lawyer-first approach.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan O'Leary</title><link>http://denniskennedy.com/blog/2006/08/by-request-week-are-there-any-software-tools-specifically-designed-for-commercial-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link> <dc:creator>Dan O'Leary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:38:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://denniskennedy_com.innosoftware.net/?p=1121#comment-146</guid> <description><![CDATA[The first step to me would be to pick a best of class document management solution, and combine it with a practice management solution. Since I work in the industry, I&#039;ll withhold my personal judgement. My recommendation would be to Google &quot;Document Management&quot; and contact a few vendors for an overview.
Cheers,
Dan
http://documentmanagementnews.blogspot.com
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first step to me would be to pick a best of class document management solution, and combine it with a practice management solution. Since I work in the industry, I&#8217;ll withhold my personal judgement. My recommendation would be to Google &#8220;Document Management&#8221; and contact a few vendors for an overview.<br
/> Cheers,<br
/> Dan<br
/> <a
href="http://documentmanagementnews.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://documentmanagementnews.blogspot.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>