Technology-Lawyer

Dennis Kennedy

Technology Law and Legal Technology. Dennis Kennedy is one of the few technology lawyers who is also an expert on the underlying technologies. Dennis an award-winning leader in the application of technology and the Internet to the practice of law. DennisKennedy.com gives you access to a wide variety of Dennis Kennedy's resources on legal technology, his writings, his well-known blog, DennisKennedy.Blog, and information about how you can have Dennis speak to your organization or group.

Dennis Kennedy is one of the most knowledgeable legal technologists you will find. - Michael Arkfeld.

Dennis Kennedy, a lawyer and legal technology expert in St. Louis, Mo., has been a significant influence in the ever-evolving relationship between lawyers and the Web. - Robert Ambrogi

Archive for March, 2007

More Than Ten Productivity Extensions for Firefox

Thursday, March 8th, 2007

The coolest thing about the Firefox browser is the way you can add all kinds of “extensions” to the browser to customize it in endless ways to suit your needs. In a way, Firefox becomes a software platform. You can also get a little carried away doing this by adding all kinds of extensions to complicate your workspace. New versions of Firefox also have the annoying feature of breaking some of your extensions.
That said, a moderate use of well-chosen Firefox extensions is a very good thing. How do you get started?
I suggested that you start with Lifehack’s “Top 10 Firefox Extensions to Improve Your Productivity.” You’ll find ten great ideas, and many more in the comments. If you haven’t experimented with extensions, you’ll have some good ones to start with. If you use extensions, I suspect you’ll find some great new ones. Here’s the one I’m adding to my Firefox installation: URLfixer. It should solve one of my most common annoyances – the slightly mistyped URL. The browser really should know what I meant to type, and now it will.
New to Firefox? Check it out and download it here. It’s good to be browser ambidextrous these days. Get even more extensions (and not just productivity extensions) at the Firefox extensions page.
[Originally posted on DennisKennedy.Blog (http://www.denniskennedy.com/blog/)]
Learn more about legal technology at Dennis Kennedy’s Legal Technology Central page.
Technorati tags:

The Day the Internet Music Died

Wednesday, March 7th, 2007

I urge you to read Mark Cuban’s post “Say Goodbye to Webcasting.”
Does our focus on intellectual property ownership rights have dire implications for the sharing of culture, our cultural legacy, and the sharing of arts among humans? As I once said, “I can’t dance to a copy of your copyright registration form.”
[Originally posted on DennisKennedy.Blog (http://www.denniskennedy.com/blog/)]
Like what you are reading? Check out the other blogs where I post – Between Lawyers (feed) and the LexThink Blog (feed).
Technorati tags:

Get Well Soon, Tom Collins

Tuesday, March 6th, 2007

One of my favorite legal bloggers and one of my favorite people I’ve met through blogging, Tom Collins, is having some surgery. I wish him the best and hope all goes well. Please keep him in your thoughts. There’s an important message for all of us in his post.

Previously on Document Assembly

Sunday, March 4th, 2007

My last two posts have been on document assembly, so I thought it might be a good idea to follow the rule of threes and post again on document assembly.
So, I went back into the archives and pulled out the second article I ever wrote on legal technology. It appeared in Lawyers Weekly USA in November, 1996. The subject was document assembly, and I now blush at my level of enthusiasm and how stunningly wrong my predictions and sense of urgency about document assembly were, in retrospect. I actually burst out laughing today when I reread the last two sentences of the article.
OK, so I’m a true believer in document assembly. I admit it. I also believe that you might enjoy this article as a primer to my way of thinking about document assembly. I have not edited or updated it. I would, however, enjoy reminiscing with any other ShortWork users who might read this post.
The money quote:

Document assembly can greatly increase your productivity and efficiency in document preparation while also allowing you to incorporate lessons that you have learned and custom language for individual clients into your standard forms.

PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE WAS ORIGINALLY WRITTEN IN 1996.
Document Assembly Saves Clients Money
A document assembly program is a software program that “automates” the preparation of legal documents. In simplest terms, a document assembly program allows a user to answer a series of questions which appear on the user’s computer screen and then uses those answers in a transparent fashion to create a completed draft of a document in the user’s word processing program.
Document assembly programs can be seen as a third stage in the evolution of document drafting, coming after the development of the typewriter and word processing programs. These programs run the range from Capsoft’s $99 Hotdocs program to $500,000 custom software.
My experience with document assembly began five years ago with a program called ShortWork which I used to create a set of estate planning applications which I use on a daily basis. I am now beginning an upgrade of those applications which will involve a conversion to another document assembly program, Caps Personal.
I have noticed three significant changes over the last five years in document assembly programs. First, the development of and focus on Windows-based programs. Second, better and more seamless integration with standard word processing programs. Third, much greater emphasis on ease of use and improved user interfaces.
Document assembly can greatly increase your productivity and efficiency in document preparation while also allowing you to incorporate lessons that you have learned and custom language for individual clients into your standard forms. Instead of trying to remember the name of the client whose trust contained your language on S Corporation stock, you can now answer the question “does the client own S Corporation stock?” on your computer screen and all the relevant language will be added to the appropriate places in your first draft.
The prospect of drafting finished documents in a matter of minutes is a realistic one. A year ago I demonstrated the Caps program at a firm meeting with the goal of producing a completed draft of a simple standard lease in less than a minute. I was successful.
I work in the area of estate planning. Estate planners have been among the pioneers in the use of document assembly packages. Estate planning documents such as wills, trusts and powers of attorney lend themselves well to document assembly in that they are standardized but also customized depending on the choices a client makes.
You should not, however, conclude that the value of document assembly is limited to this category of practice. Applications can be designed in many areas of practice: leases, bankruptcy applications, interrogatories, preparation of standard petitions, and real estate closing documents. The software developers will be happy to show you many examples.
There are two basic approaches to document assembly programs: (1) a program which allows you to automate your existing forms, and (2) a program that includes its own forms, but allows you to modify its forms so that they can be more like your own. There are pluses and minuses of each approach. Based on my experience, a wholesale conversion of your forms will take significantly more time than simply using or making adjustments to supplied forms.
That brings us to the real questions about document assembly, which is not which package to use, because there are a number of good choices. Who will implement the package? Who will maintain the document assembly forms? Who will be the person or persons using the package? Since I have five years experience, let me share a few of the lessons that I’ve learned.
The key to document assembly is advance planning. All of the time that you spend on thinking about which forms you want to convert, how you use and maintain your existing forms, how you see the document assembly package being used, what efficiencies you hope to maintain and similar questions is going to be time that is very well spent. Your planning process will help you choose a program that is well suited to what you want to accomplish and will help you focus on how you will implement the process.
My advice is to start small and build off of your successes. I started with a durable power of attorney which is a relatively simple document to automate. In that way, I could learn programming functions in a simple and straight-forward way. I used that knowledge to move on to a simple will. From the simple will, the next step was to move to more complicated wills with trusts and a variety of other options.
Another important piece of advice is to be sure to block out a period of time where you can work on implementing the document assembly package uninterrupted. While it doesn’t take a lot of time, perhaps 10 to 20 hours, to become comfortable with basic document assembly techniques, the process is highly logical and involves many steps. It is easy to get lost if you get distracted. If you work in a series of starts and stops, you will get easily frustrated. Remember: start small.
Document assembly is an excellent illustration of the “80/20″ rule. The first 20% of the time you spend working on the project will get you 80% of the way to completion. Finishing the final 20% will take 80% of your total time. On the other hand, the 80/20 rule helps you think about how far you want to go in designing your application.
The goal of document assembly is to produce a draft of a document. Your goal should not be to produce a final version of each document for each client on the first attempt. If you can use document assembly to produce a good draft of a document in five minutes or less and then do a minor amount of clean up, you will be better off than you were without document assembly. Based on my observations, after implementing a document assembly package, I have seen decreases in total drafting time of about two-thirds over our previous method.
How do you pick a system? Decide on the level of sophistication you want in the package. Decide whether you want the package that comes with its own forms. Read reviews and articles, although be sure to note that a number of articles on document assembly are written by people involved with document assembly software companies. Talk to others who are using document assembly programs. Finally, the ABA’s Law Practice Management Section is an excellent resource.
Document assembly raises some important cost recovery and billing issues. If you are going to spend several weeks, a month or more on implementing a document assembly package, how will you recover that lost income? Second, if you are billing on an hourly basis for time spent preparing documents, how will you now bill for a document that takes you only one-third of the time that it used to take?
Three approaches to recover start up costs are (1) develop your system as you work on documents for clients and bill those clients; (2) surcharge your clients for a period to recover the start up costs; or (3) make no effort to recover the start up cost, instead assume that the system will pay for itself over time during increased productivity and the opportunity to do higher volume or higher-level work.
On the second question, use of document assembly requires that you consider moving to a value billing system. In other words, it may become more appropriate to charge a fixed price for documents rather bill on the basis of time actually spent on the production of those documents. There is no single answer. The answer for you will depend on your client base and your practice, and the implementation of document assembly may give you a good opportunity to examine your existing billing practices and make appropriate changes.
The document assembly software companies have found that lawyers prepare documents in a wide variety of ways. There is no standard approach to document preparation and software companies have begun to concentrate on the user: flexibility, user interface and ease of programming. This is one benefit of waiting until now to look at document assembly.
I would not, however, wait much longer to consider document assembly. Document assembly offers real productivity gains that cannot be ignored. The environment for lawyers and law firms has become increasingly competitive. Competition has, in many cases, become based on price, and document assembly offers you a way to cut your costs.
My best practical tips? Devote substantial time to planning. Think about the $99 HotDocs program as an easy way to get your feet wet. Think hard about the packages that include forms. Give serious thought to how you will update forms once the system is in place. And, if you are not the right person to do this project, or there is no one at your firm who can or will do it, consider hiring a second year law student to take on the job. There is no time like the present to get started on document assembly. Your competitors have.
A version of this article first appeared in the November 4, 1996 issue of Lawyers Weekly USA.
[Originally posted on DennisKennedy.Blog (http://www.denniskennedy.com/blog/)]
Learn more about legal technology at Dennis Kennedy’s Legal Technology Central page.
Technorati tags:

Further Thoughts on Document Assembly

Thursday, March 1st, 2007

I was thrilled to see that contract drafting guru Ken Adams picked up on my post yesterday about document assembly and refers to the inexorable rise document assembly. I’ve learned a lot from Ken’s books, articles and blog, so it’s a nice treat for me to see that he reads my blog.
However, it’s another post by Ken today called “If They’ve Been Promoted, Why Should They Still Be Writing Contracts?” that really got me thinking about document assembly.
The post discusses the old question of whether partners should be drafting contracts (at partner hourly rates) rather than associates drafting contracts (at associate hourly rates).
Of course, this raises all of the issues about hourly billing versus value billing, and whether lawyers communicate the value they bring to the process or whether they are seen as mere scriveners.
Adams cuts to the heart of the matter with his money quote:

The solution isn’t to have partners more involved. Instead, associates should be less involved: drafting should be commoditized.

For me, the very essence of the role of document assembly is encapsulated in this comment, the implied questions it asks, and the answers to those questions that we might generate. Read Ken’s entire post in that context and see if you agree with me.
By the way, I’m also reminded by the oft-heard comment that lawyers should learn to type faster and that a slow-typing lawyer costs a client more money because you have to pay for extra typing time (as if thinking is not part of the drafting process). Document assembly, properly employed, offers a quantum leap over increased typing speed and lets you apply the knowledge and expertise that you’ve developed over the years. That is the flip-side of commoditizing drafting and a very interesting place to be.
[Originally posted on DennisKennedy.Blog (http://www.denniskennedy.com/blog/)]
Learn more about legal technology at Dennis Kennedy’s Legal Technology Central page.
Technorati tags: